What a wagering requirement is made of, and which of our rows print each part
Daniel M.
Published 6 min read
As of 16 October 2026, 28 of the 741 rows in our feed carry something in the wagering field. No two of the operators behind them fill it in the same way.
That is the whole finding, and it matters more than it sounds. A wagering requirement is not one number. It is three parts, with more conditions around them, and the multiple that gets quoted is only one of them.
The parts
A wagering requirement says how much you must stake before bonus money, or what it wins, can be withdrawn. Typically it has these parts.
The multiple. How many times over. It is the part that gets quoted, and the part that gets compared, which is the trouble.
The base. What the multiple is applied to: the bonus amount, the deposit, deposit plus bonus, or the winnings from a batch of spins. Same multiple, different base, different bill. The fields we leave empty argues for reading the noun after the number, and this post is the part where we can show it on real rows.
The clock. A deadline to finish, and what it runs from: the moment the bonus was credited, the moment you opted in, the moment you deposited. Those are not the same moment.
Then the quieter conditions. Which games count and at what rate, and how large a single bet or spin may be while the requirement is open. No row of ours prints either.
We print no figure in this post: a number typed into a post does not change when an operator changes its terms. The figures our rows hold are on the rows themselves, with the date we read them, and the operator's page is the only place they are current. Why so many of our rows have nothing in this field is in what we can tell you about wagering requirements.
What our rows print
Going by the rows we collected, as of 16 October 2026, operator by operator. Each of the three prints a different slice.
Melbet prints the most, and only on one kind of row. The slot items under our free spins tag are nine items, each listed twice, so eighteen rows. On every one the wagering field holds a multiple, a base and a number of days. The days read as the time allowed to finish, though the row does not say so. The base the field names is winnings, which on a free spins item we read as the winnings from the spins, not a deposit and not a bonus amount. The number of days is the same on all eighteen, and it is on the rows themselves, not in this post. The multiple is not the same: across the nine items it takes four different values. So "Melbet's wagering" is not an answer to anything. It is nine answers, and the item in front of you decides which.
What the row leaves out is what the days run from. A number of days, from when? Our field does not say, and it is the question that decides how much of the time you actually get. The slot items themselves are described in how casino free spins work.
Then the contrast. Melbet's welcome package rows leave the field empty. So do the package rows at 1xBet, BetWinner and Pin-Up, and every row we hold at Mostbet. Empty means we did not collect it. It does not mean there is nothing to collect.
Melstroy prints a multiple and a base, and no number of days. Its four deposit-step rows each state one multiple, labelled as applying to the bonus, and it is the same on all four steps. Its package row states two, and labels the second as applying to the free spins. Each step row's title names its spins, but its wagering field says nothing about them. That gap is the interesting one: on the package row the spins and the money are governed by different numbers, and a step row whose wagering field names only the bonus is showing half of the bill. The package row also carries an end date that had already passed when we collected it, so we cannot tell you whether that offer still runs. One more Melstroy row, a weekly cashback, holds a zero and says in its description that no wagering applies to the credit, then points to the full terms for eligibility and exclusions. A zero and a pointer to the small print, in the same row. The cashback post has that one.
Parimatch prints a zero and nothing else: no base, no number of days. Four rows hold it, a daily and a monthly rakeback row, a weekly cashback and a daily cash drops promotion, each saying no wagering applies. They were last collected on 3 October 2026, which makes them the oldest rows in this post by thirteen days. We cannot tell whether those programmes still run. A zero is the shortest wagering requirement there is, and also the one where the missing detail matters most: our rows do not say what you have to do to earn the credit in the first place.
Put side by side: one operator gives a multiple, a base and a number of days, one gives a multiple and a base, one gives a zero. No row says which games count toward any of it. That is a description of what our collected rows hold, not a verdict on any offer.
Two numbers that look alike and are not
A multiple on spin winnings and a multiple on a bonus are not the same size of obligation, even when the multiples match. One is applied to whatever the spins happened to win, which you cannot know in advance. The other is applied to an amount credited to you up front. Which is heavier depends on both bases, and on a number of days one of them carries and the other, in our rows, does not.
This is why a low multiple does not make an offer the better one. It is also why we do not rank offers on it: a term we can read is not a term we have checked. A printed multiple tells you what the operator's page said on the day we read it, and nothing about whether it is fair.
What to find on the operator's own page
- The multiple, and the exact words after it. Bonus, deposit, deposit plus bonus, winnings: that noun is the base.
- The deadline, and the moment it runs from.
- Whether the spins and the money carry separate requirements, as Melstroy's package row shows.
- Which games count, and whether any count for less.
- The largest single bet allowed while the requirement is open.
Several of the rows described here are listed under free spins, welcome bonuses and cashback.
A requirement means staking
A wagering requirement means staking a multiple of an amount before it can be withdrawn. Staking means risking money, and casino games typically carry a house edge, so over time the expected result is a loss. A requirement is not a hurdle between you and a gift, and clearing one is not a way to earn. Nothing on this page suggests you will win. Decide how much you are willing to lose before you look at any offer, not after.
Terms vary by operator and change without notice, so T&Cs apply to every offer named here. This page is information, not advice. You must be 18 or over to gamble, 21 or over in Kazakhstan. If gambling stops being fun, stop, and see our responsible gambling page.
Tags
- wagering
- how-to
- catalogue
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you follow one to an operator and later register or deposit, we may earn a commission from that operator. It costs you nothing, and it does not change the offer you are given or the order offers appear in.
Ready to see today's listed offers?
Open the Telegram bot to browse bonuses filtered to your country — no sign-up, no email.
Open the Telegram BotFrequently Asked Questions
What is a wagering requirement made of?+
Typically three things. A multiple, how many times over you must stake. A base, the amount that multiple is applied to, such as the bonus, the deposit or the winnings from spins. And a deadline, the time you have to finish. Which games count, and how large a single bet may be while the requirement is open, are usually set alongside them. All of it is in the operator's own terms. T&Cs apply.
Does "no wagering" mean nothing is attached to the offer?+
Not necessarily. It is the operator's statement about the credit it describes. Other conditions, such as who qualifies, what you must stake to earn the credit in the first place, or a cap on what is paid, can still apply, and they are in the operator's terms. Where one of our rows holds a zero, treat it as the operator's claim about that credit, not as a finding of ours. T&Cs apply.
Which operators' rows in your catalogue print a wagering requirement?+
It depends on the row, and on the day. As of 16 October 2026, rows from three operators carry something in the wagering field: Melbet on its slot items, Melstroy on its welcome and cashback rows, Parimatch on rows that say no wagering applies (those were last collected on 3 October 2026). The rest of the catalogue leaves the field empty, which means we did not collect it, not that the operator sets none. We print no figure here. T&Cs apply.
Is a lower wagering multiple the better offer?+
Not on its own. A multiple applied to spin winnings and a multiple applied to a bonus are different obligations, and the deadline changes what either costs you. This page does not rank offers, and our rows cannot settle the question. Read the base and the deadline in the operator's terms before comparing anything. T&Cs apply.